<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Current Issue</title>
    <link>http://japha.org/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:43:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@japha.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@japha.org</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Adoption of medication therapy management programs in Minnesota: 2006–11</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686686</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Larson S, Drake S, Anderson L, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To assess the adoption of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) medication therapy management (MTM) program by patients and pharmacists.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Descriptive nonexperimental study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Minnesota DHS MTM program, from 2006 to 2011.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main outcome measures&lt;/div&gt;Number of claims, providers, and dollars compensated each year from 2006 to 2011, as well as location of claim submissions and percent of eligible patients served in 2011.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;During 2011, 76 pharmacists were compensated a total of $210,716 for 2,427 claims. Of these claims, 1,009 were initial visits and 1,418 were follow-up visits. In each of the first 6 years of the program, an increase was seen in number of claims, number of pharmacists submitting claims, and dollars compensated. These increases followed exponential curves for total number of claims and dollars compensated with a declining logarithmic curve for pharmacists. From 2010 to 2011, the number of claims and dollars compensated did not increase as much from 2009 to 2010. However, claims data may still increase for 2011 as a result of late submissions. During 2011, the percentage of eligible patients provided services was estimated to be 5.7% to 7.6%.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;The continued increase in use indicates that the program has had a successful beginning and promises to serve many more patients. The small percentage of patients reached should increase with subsequent years. Better strategies to recruit patients and pharmacist providers should increase use of the program.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686686</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Minnesota Department of Human Services audit of medication therapy management programs</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686684</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Smith S, Cell P, Anderson L, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To inform medication therapy management (MTM) providers of findings of the Minnesota Department of Human Services review of claims submitted to Minnesota Health Care Programs (MHCP) for patients receiving MTM services and to discuss the impact of the audit on widespread MTM services and future audits.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Methods&lt;/div&gt;A retrospective review was completed on MTM claims submitted to MHCP from 2008 to 2010. The auditor verified that the Current Procedural Terminology codes billed matched the actual number of medications, conditions, and drug therapy problems assessed during an encounter.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;190 claims were reviewed for 57 distinct pharmacies that billed for MTM services from 2008 to 2010, representing 4.5% of all claims submitted. The auditor reported that generally, the documentation within the electronic medical record had the least “up-coding” of all documentation systems. A total of 18 claims were coded at a higher level than appropriate, but only 10 notices were sent out to recover money because the others did not meet the minimum $50 threshold.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;The auditor expressed concerns that a number of claims billed at the highest complexity level were only 15 minutes long. Providers will need to be cautious of the conditions that they bill as complex and of how they define drug therapy problems. Everything for which is being billed must be clearly assessed or rationalized in the documentation note. The auditor expressed that overall, documentation was well done; however, many MTM providers are now asking how to internally prepare for future audits.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686684</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Characteristics and trends of drug and dietary supplement inquiries by college athletes</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686692</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ambrose PJ, Tsourounis C, Uryasz FD, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To characterize the types of drug and dietary supplement inquiries submitted to the National Center for Drug Free Sport through the Resource Exchange Center (REC).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Cross-sectional study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;United States, from July 2009 through June 2010.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Athletes and athletic personnel associated with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Tabulation and classification of drugs and dietary supplement inquiries.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main outcome measure&lt;/div&gt;Characteristics and trends of drug and dietary supplement inquiries.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Inquiries for prescription medications for albuterol inhalers, methylphenidate, amphetamines, and prednisone were the most common using a drug lookup function. The most common inquiries for over-the-counter medications included pseudoephedrine, loratadine, cetirizine, and caffeine. Among dietary supplements, inquiries for amino acids/metabolites, vitamins and minerals, and herbal products occurred most frequently. One dietary supplement, N.O.-Xplode (Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc.), accounted for the majority of individual dietary supplement inquiries. Banned substances accounted for 30% of all inquiries submitted to the REC and 18% of medications searched in a drug lookup database.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;Almost 25,000 inquiries were submitted to the REC. Pharmacists can use this information to advise, counsel, and refer NCAA athletes regarding the use of banned and permitted substances. Education programs regarding stimulants, dietary supplements, and the risk of using substances such as animal byproducts are needed, and pharmacists can participate in these programs.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686692</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Community pharmacists’ occupational satisfaction and stress: A profession in jeopardy?</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686691</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Munger MA, Gordon E, Hartman J, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To quantify and model drivers of community pharmacists’ self-reported levels of occupational satisfaction and stress and to identify key segments for possible intervention by the profession.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Descriptive nonexperimental study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;United States during January to February 2012.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;303 independent and community chain pharmacists.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Online survey instrument of previously validated occupational stress and satisfaction attribute batteries.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Participants reported a high level of dissatisfaction with current employment, with more than 50% stating that they were considering quitting their jobs. Dissatisfaction was higher among those with a doctor of pharmacy degree and those employed in community chains. Occupational stress and satisfaction were highly correlated with the intention to search for a new position. Approximately 20% of respondents felt that stress from their employment adversely affected their mental health and well-being, physical health, quality of the work, or relationships with family and friends.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;Substantive levels of occupational dissatisfaction and stress exist among pharmacists currently in community practice. These negative attributes are associated with a damaging promotion of community practice—a marker of a negative trajectory in sustaining this practice environment. The results of this study have implications for the health care industry, commercial pharmacy vendors, independent pharmacies, the profession, and academic training institutions as they prepare the pharmacy workforce of the future for potentially dissatisfying and stressful work environments.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686691</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparing point-of-care A1C and random plasma glucose for screening diabetes in migrant farm workers</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686687</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Wensil AM, Smith JD, Pound MW, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To compare point-of-care (POC) glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and random plasma glucose (RPG) as a POC screening tool for prediabetes and diabetes in migrant farm workers of eastern North Carolina.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Prospective, observational, single-center study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Federally qualified community health center in eastern North Carolina, from August to October 2011.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Migrant farm workers 18 years or older who resided in a migrant camp in eastern North Carolina.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Diabetes screening using POC A1C and RPG via fingerstick followed by venipuncture A1C and basic metabolic panel in individuals with a positive screening.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main outcome measures&lt;/div&gt;Positive predictive value (PPV) of POC A1C and RPG, incidence of positive screening, incidence of confirmed diagnosis, concordance rate of the screening tools, and correlation between POC A1C and laboratory A1C.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;206 workers participated in the screenings; screening identified 39 individuals with a POC A1C greater than 5.7% and 1 individual with both an RPG of 200 mg/dL or more and a POC A1C greater than 5.7%. Of the 39 individuals found to have a positive screening, 24 presented to Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc., for follow-up venipuncture; however, 1 participant did not have a venipuncture A1C, leaving 23 individuals with complete data. Two participants were diagnosed with diabetes and 17 with prediabetes. POC A1C had a PPV of 82.6%; however, the PPV of RPG could not be calculated due to the number of participants lost to follow-up. POC A1C correlated well with laboratory A1C regardless of time to follow-up.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;POC A1C should be considered for diabetes screening in high-risk populations. If the screening had been performed with RPG alone, 38 individuals would have gone undetected. Early identification of individuals with elevated blood glucose will likely decrease the risk of long-term complications.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686687</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How does use of a prescription monitoring program change pharmacy practice?</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686689</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Green TC, Mann MR, Bowman SE, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To assess differences in prescription monitoring program (PMP) use between two states with different PMP accessibility (Connecticut [CT] and Rhode Island [RI]), to explore use of PMPs in pharmacy practice, and to examine associations between PMP use and pharmacists’ responses to suspected diversion or “doctor shopping.”&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Descriptive nonexperimental study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;CT and RI from March through August 2011.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Licensed pharmacists in CT and RI.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Anonymous surveys e-mailed to pharmacists&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main outcome measures&lt;/div&gt;PMP use, use of patient reports in pharmacy practice, and responses to suspected doctor shopping or diversion.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Responses from 294 pharmacists were received (CT: 198; RI: 96). PMP users were more likely to use the PMP to detect drug abuse (CT: 79%; RI: 21.9%; 
                        &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; &lt; 0.01) and doctor shopping (67%; 7%; 
                        &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; &lt; 0.01). When faced with suspicious medication use behavior, PMP users were less likely than nonusers to discuss their concerns with the patient (adjusted odds ratio 0.48 [95% CI 0.25–0.92]) but as likely to contact the provider (0.86 [0.21–3.47]), refer the patient back to the prescriber (1.50 [0.79–2.86]), and refuse to fill the prescription (0.63 [0.30–1.30]). PMP users were less likely to state they were out of stock of the drug (0.27 [0.12–0.60]) compared with nonusers. Pharmacists reported high interest in attending continuing education on safe dispensing (72.8%).
                    &lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;Pharmacists are important participants in the effort to address prescription drug misuse and abuse. Current PMP use with prevailing systems had limited influence on pharmacy practice. Findings point to future research and needed practice and education innovations to improve patient safety and safer opioid dispensing for pharmacists.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686689</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medication adherence program: Adherence challenges and interventions in type 2 diabetes</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686688</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Odegard P, Carpinito G, Christensen DB. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To describe medication adherence problems for adults with type 2 diabetes and to assess the nature and frequency of pharmacist activities in addressing them and proximate outcomes.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Pre–post analysis.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Four community chain pharmacies located in Seattle, WA, from April 2008 to October 2009.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Patients&lt;/div&gt;120 patients (mean age &gt;60 years) with type 2 diabetes taking oral diabetes medications and who were 6 or more days late for refills.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention&lt;/div&gt;Pharmacist telephone-initiated adherence support.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main outcomes measures&lt;/div&gt;Nature and frequency of adherence-related problems and intervention activities and impact on reduction in refill gaps.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;The primary adherence challenge was difficulty taking medications (27.1%). Failure to remember doses and forgetting refills were reported by 24.6% and 26.3% of patients at baseline, respectively. Pharmacists provided support through some form of patient education (35.6% of encounters) or other adherence support (40.7%). Pharmacist time averaged slightly greater than 5 minutes per intervention and 12.6 ± 10.7 minutes (mean ± SD) over 12 months, with 3.4 ± 2.4 interventions per patient. Patient-specific education and adherence support by pharmacists and total intervention time were positively correlated, with a modest but significant reduction in refill gaps during 12 months of follow-up.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;Not remembering to refill medications was the most commonly reported problem. Patient encounters averaged 4 to 6 minutes for the first visit and 12 to 13 minutes over 12 months. Phone calls by pharmacists to adults who were late for oral diabetes medication refills were effective in identifying adherence-related problems and developing support strategies to promote medication self-management in busy urban community chain pharmacy settings.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stability of U-500 regular insulin in prefilled syringes</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686693</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Lull ME, Piacentino JJ, Traina AN. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To evaluate the stability of U-500 regular insulin in prefilled syringes stored under refrigeration for up to 28 days.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Methods&lt;/div&gt;U-500 regular insulin was drawn up in 1 mL insulin syringes in a clean, nonsterile environment to emulate conditions of a patient's home. Samples were assayed using a stability-indicating reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method immediately after preparation (day 0) and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days under refrigeration. Before evaluation, all samples were diluted to a concentration of 40 units/mL in the starting mobile phase. Stability was determined by evaluating the percentage of the initial concentration remaining at each time point.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;At least 93.3% of the initial U-500 insulin concentration remained throughout the 28-day study period, with no statistically significant changes in the amount remaining. The percent of initial concentration remained above 97% for the first 21 days of the study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;A prefilled syringe with U-500 regular insulin is stable for at least 28 days when stored under refrigeration. These data are similar to those reported for U-100 regular insulin, indicating that prefilling syringes with U-500 insulin is a safe and effective practice for patients who are unable to accurately draw up their own point-of-care doses.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686693</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Caring for visually impaired patients</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686699</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Orrico KB. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To raise pharmacist awareness about the needs and concerns of our patients with visual impairment and to review useful strategies to foster medication adherence.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Summary&lt;/div&gt;As patient-centered pharmacists, we need to understand the challenges faced by our patients with low vision and tailor pharmaceutical care to best fit their needs. Evidence-based best practices in labeling and written communication have been developed by the American Foundation for the Blind in partnership with the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. These recommendations include the use of specific font styles, minimum font size, and other standards known to enhance usability for those with limited vision. Recent advances in assistive technologies such as audio output and object recognition software can be used to ease the medication-taking process and effectively communicate important drug and safety information in a manner that can be understood by those with low vision. In July 2012, the Prescription Accessible Drug Labeling Promotion Act of 2012 (HR 4087) was signed into law. This new legislation is an addition to the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, which required the development and ultimate implementation by pharmacies of national best practices intended to improve the accessibility of prescription drug labeling for the visually impaired.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;As a patient-centered profession, we need to advocate for our patients with special needs by partnering with government and patient groups to support and enact legislation intended to enhance people's ability to adhere to drug therapy.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686699</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spirometry: Tool for pharmacy practitioners to expand direct patient care services</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686694</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cawley MJ, Moon J, Reinhold J, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Abstract&lt;/div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Objectives:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; To introduce pharmacy practitioners to spirometry testing and provide strategies for integrating this “value-added” tool with other direct patient care pharmacy services.
                    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Data sources:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Spirometry literature and resources obtained through search strategies including Ovid, PubMed, and Google Scholar.
                    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Summary:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Pharmacists are distinctive members of the multidisciplinary patient care team and can contribute by performing spirometry services for pulmonary patients. Pharmacists have been largely absent from performing this much needed service, perhaps as a result of lack of training or because this testing may be perceived as irrelevant to the pharmacist scope of practice. However, pharmacists are actively integrated with many aspects of pulmonary patient care, including recommending and adjusting inhaled pharmacological agents, monitoring for potential drug–drug and drug–disease interactions, recommending smoking cessation, assessing patient prescription insurance coverage, and educating patients, caregivers, and health care providers on use of prescribed respiratory delivery devices. Adding quality spirometry services, based on American Thoracic Society guidelines for accuracy, would increase the breadth and depth of services for pharmacy practitioners.
                    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; Spirometry testing is an added tool for expanding direct patient care pharmacy services. Physician support, appropriate pharmacist training, and understanding of reimbursement of spirometry services are essential in providing quality spirometry testing. Future studies are needed to assess the role of pharmacists in performing spirometry and measuring the performance outcomes of pulmonary patients.
                    &lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686694</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enhancing pharmacists’ role as oral health advisors</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686695</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cohen LA. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To examine the expanded role of pharmacists as oral health advisors.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;U.S. community pharmacies.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Practice description&lt;/div&gt;Counseling patients on issues related to oral health.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Practice innovation&lt;/div&gt;The traditional role of pharmacists (i.e., dispensing medications) has evolved to include a broader range of functions associated with primary health care. Pharmacists are important members of the health care team and have an important role in addressing oral health–related problems. The pharmacist role in addressing oral health issues in the United States should be expanded.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;Studies are needed to examine the extent of pharmacist training in oral health, the degree to which pharmacists who receive oral health training incorporate it into their practices, and pharmacist interest in relevant continuing education. Data gathered from such studies will be invaluable in developing appropriate training standards, model curricula, and clinical best practices.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686695</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing quality in pharmacy education in an era of rapid expansion: Response to Maine and Vlasses</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686685</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Popovich NG, Robert L. M, Roberts JC, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;We read with interest the article by Maine and Vlasses
            &lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href="#refid1-JAPhA.2013.12182" class="reflinks"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; in the Jul/Aug 2012 issue of the 
            &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;JAPhA&lt;/span&gt; and had the following observations.
        &lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686685</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing quality in pharmacy education in an era of rapid expansion: Response to Popovich et al.</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686682</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Maine LL, Vlasses PH. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;We are pleased to have an opportunity to address the critique of our article
            &lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href="#refid1-JAPhA.2013.12237" class="reflinks"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; by Popovich et al.
            &lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href="#refid2-JAPhA.2013.12237" class="reflinks"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; Popovich et al. raise important issues regarding the workforce in pharmacy, the validity of available measures of quality, and the objectivity of two organizations (i.e., Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education [ACPE] and American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy [AACP]), whose chief executive officers coauthored the original manuscript.
        &lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686682</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Achieving recognition as patient-centered care providers: We are our own best advocates</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686683</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cooke R, Lipowski E, Magness JW. </author>
      <description />
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686683</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vaccination exemptions: Implications of decline in vaccination rates</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686696</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Descourouez JL, Hayney MS. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Vaccines protect individuals to whom they are administered. Unlike other medical interventions, many vaccines also protect people around the immunized individual. Herd protection is defined as the resistance of a group to a disease as a result of the immunity of a large proportion of group members and the consequent lessening of the likelihood of an infected individual coming into contact with a susceptible individual.
            &lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href="#refid1-JAPhA.2013.13516" class="reflinks"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; Because herd protection depends on high immunization rates in a population, any threat to these high rates must be considered carefully.
        &lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686696</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lorcaserin, dimethyl fumarate, and bedaquiline fumarate</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686697</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Hussar DA, Polyak G. </author>
      <description />
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686697</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations and outcomes and distance versus local learning</title>
      <link>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686698</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ried L. </author>
      <description />
      <guid>http://japha.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>