0
Research
Development of the Consumer Assessment of Pharmacy Services survey
Susan J. Blalock, PhD; San Keller, PhD; David Nau, PhD, BSPharm, CPHQ; Elizabeth M. Frentzel, MPH
J Am Pharm Assoc. 2012;52:324-332. doi:10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10149

Abstract

Objectives  To develop and test a tool for obtaining patient evaluations of the quality of pharmacy services provided in ambulatory settings.

Design  Descriptive, exploratory, nonexperimental study.

Setting  United States from June 1, 2006, through May 31, 2007.

Participants  895 individuals who obtained prescription medications from participating pharmacies.

Intervention  Items were evaluated for inclusion in composite scales based on factor analysis and frequency of missing data. Standard psychometric methods were used to assess the reliability and construct validity of the resulting three composite and three global-item measures.

Main outcome measure  Patient assessment of the quality of ambulatory care pharmacy services.

Results  Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a subset of 15 items measuring three aspects of pharmacy services (General Staff Communication, Health- and Medication-Focused Communication, and Clarity of Written Information about Medications) provided excellent fit to the data. Cronbach's alphas for these scales were greater than 0.80. The three scales and corresponding three global ratings of quality reliably described differences among providers of pharmacy services.

Conclusion  These data provide support for the reliability and validity of the Consumer Assessment of Pharmacy Services survey. Although preliminary results regarding reliability and validity are promising, further study of the survey is warranted.

Sign In
APhA Members 
Welcome to JAPha.org! Please log in below using your APhA username and password. If you need to update your account information, please go to Pharmacists.org and login using your current credentials.
Username
Password


Forgot your password?
Not a Subscriber
New to JAPhA? Become an APhA member to receive a full subscription to both the print and online editions.

OR

Register for a FREE limited account to benefit from personalization features such as alerts.

References

Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC.  Pharmaceutical care practice. New York:  McGraw-Hill;  1998.
 
MacKeigan LD, Larson LJ.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services. Med Care. 1989;27:522–36.[CrossRef]
 
Larson LJ, KacKeigan LD.  Further validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services. J Pharm Mark Manage. 1994;8:125–39.[CrossRef]
 
Larson LJ, Rovers JP, MacKeigan LD.  Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care: Update of a validated instrument. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2002;42:44–50.[CrossRef]
 
Gupchup GV, Wolfgang AP, Thomas J 3rd. Development of a scale to measure directive guidance by pharmacists. Ann Pharmacother. 1996;30:1369–75.
 
Hernandez L, Chang CH, Cella D, et al. Development and validation of the satisfaction with pharmacist scale. Pharmacotherapy. 2000;20:837–43.[CrossRef]
 
Gourley GK, Gourley DR, La Monica Rigolosi E, et al. Development and validation of the pharmaceutical care satisfaction questionnaire. Am J Manag Care. 2001;7:461–6.
 
Kucukarsian S, Pathak DS, Summers K. Response-oriented patient evaluation survey (ropes): an administrator's tool for identifying opportunities for service quality improvement. J Manag Care Pharm. 1998;4:311–20.
 
Briesacher B, Corey R. Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services at independent and chain pharmacies. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54:531–6.
 
Singhal PK, Gupchup GV, Raisch DW, et al. Impact of pharmacists' directive guidance behaviors on patient satisfaction. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2002;42:407–12.[CrossRef]
 
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines: Minimum standard for pharmaceutical services in ambulatory care. Accessed at www.ashp.org/DocLibrary/BestPractices/SettingsGdlMinAmb.aspx, March 12,  2007.
 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS: surveys and tools to improve patient care. Accessed at www.cahps.ahrq.gov/qiguide/default.aspx, October 7,  2010.
 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS: surveys and tools to advance patient-centered care. Accessed at www.cahps.ahrq.gov/default.asp, April 6,  2009.
 
Goldstein E, Farquhar M, Crofton C, et al. Measuring hospital care from the patients' perspective: an overview of the CAHPS hospital survey development process. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1977–95.[CrossRef]
 
Keller S, O'Malley AJ, Hays RD, et al. Methods used to streamline the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2057–77.[CrossRef]
 
Keller S, Col Martin GC, Evensen CT, Capt Mitton RH.  The development and testing of a survey instrument for benchmarking dental plan performance: using insured patients' experiences as a gauge of dental care quality. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140:229–37.
 
Joreskog KG.  Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika. 1978;43:443–7.[CrossRef]
 
Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP.  Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull. 1988;103:391–410.[CrossRef]
 
Hu L, Bentler PM.  Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH, Ed.  Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA:  Sage;  1995:76–99.
 
Kaiser HF.  The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:141–51.[CrossRef]
 
Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1954;18:277–96.[CrossRef]
 
Cattell RB.  The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966;1:245–76.[CrossRef]
 
Thurston LL.  Vectors of the mind. Chicago:  University of Chicago Press;  1935.
 
Rubin DB.  Inference and missing data. Biometrika. 1976;63:581–92.[CrossRef]
 
Rubin DB.  Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York:  John Wiley & Sons;  1987.
 
O'Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Hays RD, et al. Exploratory factor analyses of the CAHPS hospital pilot survey responses across and within medical, surgical, and obstetric services. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2078–95.[CrossRef]
 
Cronbach LJ.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–34.[CrossRef]
 
Helmstadter GC.  Principles of psychological measurement. New York:  Appleton-Century-Crofts;  1964.
 
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH.  Psychometric theory.3rd ed. New York:  McGraw-Hill;  1994.
 
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ:  Erlbaum;  1988.
 
O'Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, et al. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2162–81.[CrossRef]
 
Hargraves JL, Wilson IB, Zaslavsky A, et al. Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care. 2001;39:635–41.[CrossRef]
 
de Vries H, Elliott MN, Hepner KA, et al. Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS hospital survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:2120–39.[CrossRef]
 
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of the editorial staff.
* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

JAPhA Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Advertisement
 
  • Print
  • PDF Download
  • Email
  • Share
  • Get Citation
  • Submit Comment
  • Article Alerts
    Please Wait... Processing your request... Please Wait.
    You must sign in to sign-up for alerts.

    Please confirm that your email address is correct, so you can successfully receive this alert.

  • Letters To Editor
  • Reprints